« I prefer Lancashire to London | Back to School » |
Knickers?
21 comments
I know from bitter experience that you can’t force yourself to want/like/love someone more than you do, but I can’t help feeling sorry for Trina, because the inevitable break up will be just as you describe.
Name change, not sure why.
- Homer
I never wear knickers when I go to a party. They’re crotch tyranny.
“Erm… I’m not sure it would be of great interest, to be honest.”
You’re excellent at understating, Looby but i think she smells a rat. I too, need my privacy and enjoy being alone sometimes.
*selects hottest temperatura to iron knickers*
Best plan F. Men should leave well alone from such esoteric practices.
Homer/Suzy: Yes, it’s a shame. There’s been this disparity of feeling from day one. I like her to knock about with, go out dancing, have sex, and so on, but I can’t feel anything else. Whereas she often says she loves me. Oh well, we’ll cross that one when we come to it.
Leni: Foreign girls, so louche.
Hipster: I was surprised she even asked to come along really. Why would you automatically be interested in what your boyf is doing? And just mind the scorch marks.
The lecture sounds interesting, although I get a bit of a bee in my bonnet about his Catholicism.
Life is way too short to be ironing knickers.
i find myself a little sad for Trina - and can see the same ending you predict, as does Homer. In my fantasy world, she wakes up one morning, says “Thank you, my dear, it has been lovely, but I simply can’t get what I need with you.” and moves on…
The odds of that happening are probably about the same as her realizing that she should just relax and enjoy the moments at hand and forget about what’s next because it simply doesn’t matter…
Ach. All the questions. What a grind. And…please. She remembered exactly what she said. I’ve played that game myself. It’s all about to blow-up, I’m afraid. Maybe for good this time.
We have a futon that we plop our guests on. They’re amazing. An engineering marvel. Enough to restore my faith in humanity.
I wish I could come to your party. You could all watch from a distance and be entertained by how blitzed I become over such a small quantity of alcohol.
GB: Yes, I just steer clear of Eagleton’s Catholicism. I’m more interested in his earlier period, before he did this Turn to Jesus. It’s really Williams we;ll be discussing though, one of my first cultural studies loves.
DF: No, that’s not going to happen, neither of them, unfortunately. I’m happy with just enjoying ourselves. I think something has changed though, this last couple of days. And it’ll be interesting to see what happens when she’s off for two weeks.
Exile: Yes… the end creeps nearer, perhaps. It’s a measure of my cold rationality that I hope this doesn’t come before we’ve gone to France in April!
You’d enjoy the company at my party, I’m pretty sure. And there’s no need to absolutely hammered–I had enough of that with Richard on NYE, who very nearly got chucked out.
PS Despite being considerably younger than most of you, I have never woken up after a night on a futon and NOT felt as if someone had been working me over with a crowbar all night. Fucking things.
IKWYM–everyone’s got different levels of hardness (ooer) they prefer. I prefer something just one level more forgiving than a plank. The mattress I now need to get rid of is a good one – it was new a couple of years ago and hardly used for one of those, and is Slumberland – but is just too soft for me.
When you say “louche” you mean me? *laughs loudly*
Do you read Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason before you go to bed? It’s a bit anti-lust, isn’t it? But I bet you don’t have that problem…
A woman who goes without her undergarments at conversazione can I think, reasonably be described as “louche".
I’ve read The Critique right through once, and that was a long time ago, and I had expert help. I’m still in awe of it though. I recently found it a solace when Trina and I had had an argument. She stormed tearfully off to bed, and whilst sat on my own downstairs, looking resentfully at the uncomfortable sofa that was to be my bed, I saw that one of my most longstanding blogpals was re-reading it.
Leni….there’s nowt wrong with a bit of Kant ! ;)
Certainly not, Gossamer. But I do prefer your Bits of Before. ;)
*pulls knickers on and sticks tongue at Looby*
Sorry, *puts knickers on*
lapsus, tipo… whatever *grrrr*
That’s an interesting distinction Leni. But one perhaps to be discussed in a context other than the disembodied internet.
Knickers I think should be “put” on, but “pulled” off. Or down. [That’s enough–Ed.]
Thank you Looby! You can’t imagine how useful your English clases can be! ;)
*puts knickers on, pulls knickers off*
I’m a firm, a very firm, believer in practising what one has learnt.
Leni please, behave sweety… at least virtually!
Enough knickers, ladies and gentlemen.
I’d love to get on my high horse about the Kant, but as my own project to actually finish reading it involves making it un-re-giftable by dint of copious pencil annotations, I can hardly complain.
Besides, it’s a good philosophy whose goal is to make people feel more comfortable with their own human condition, even if that does merely involve getting some sleep. And Le Corbusier would applaud the space-saving qualities of the resulting futon, I’m sure.
Form is loading...